California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from HPT Ihg-2 Props. Trust v. City of Anaheim, G054000 (Cal. App. 2018):
As to the first argument, citing La Mar v. Superior Court (1948) 87 Cal.App.2d 126 disapproved on another ground in Phelan v. Superior Court (1950) 35 Cal. 2d 363, 371, plaintiffs assert the "judgment must conform to the [HPT1 S]tatement of [D]ecision." (Underscoring omitted.) Relying on the passages noted above, plaintiffs
Page 5
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.