The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Allard, 634 F.2d 1182 (9th Cir. 1980):
7 We recognize that a different analysis may be appropriate where the object seized is a vehicle. See Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 48, 52, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 1979, 1981, 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970).
8 Because of the resolution of this case, it is unnecessary to reach appellant's other contentions.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.