As stated in R v. Bishop (April 24, 1998), Hill J. (Ont. Gen. Div.)(unreported) at pages 4-5, the appropriate starting reference point is that a convicted importer is a principal. This is a presumption that can be rebutted by an accused individual. The facts relating to the circumstances of the importation are, of course, peculiarly within the knowledge of the accused. The presumption that the accused is acting on her own can be rebutted by proof, on a balance of probabilities, pursuant to s.724(3)(d) of the Criminal Code.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.