In addition, in view of the ambiguity whether ss. 30 and 69(1) of the Immigration Act authorize the practice of law by persons not licensed by any bar in any province, I must have regard to constitutional norms in interpreting those sections. One of these norms is that the court should avoid conflict between federal and provincial laws. In A.G. Canada v. Law Society of B.C., 1982 CanLII 29 (SCC), [1982] 2 S.C.R. 307 at 356, Estey J., speaking for a unanimous court, stated the principle as follows: ...When a federal statute can be properly interpreted so as not to interfere with a provincial statute, such an interpretation is to be applied in preference to another applicable construction which would bring about a conflict between the two statutes.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.