California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Cruz, F063811 (Cal. App. 2013):
14. Even if this were not the case, the simultaneous possession of two or more "batches" of a single type of controlled substance would still only be one physical act. (See People v. Schroeder, supra, 264 Cal.App.2d at pp. 227-228.)
15. The fact that the sentences were concurrent rather than consecutive does not bring them into compliance with section 654. (See People v. Deloza, supra, 18 Cal.4th at pp. 591-592 ["If, for example, a defendant suffers two convictions, punishment for one of which is precluded by section 654, that section requires the sentence for one conviction to be imposed, and the other imposed and then stayed. [Citation.] Section 654 does not allow any multiple punishments, including either concurrent or consecutive sentences. [Citation.]"]. See also Branch, supra, 119 Cal.App.2d at p. 496.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.