Is there any error of law in a judge's analysis of the doctrine of unjust enrichment?
Yukon, Canada
The following excerpt is from Murphy v. Szulinszky, 2016 YKCA 16 (CanLII):
I am unable to find any error of law in the judge’s legal analysis. With respect to the doctrine of unjust enrichment, he relied on Kerr v. Baranow, 2011 SCC 10 (CanLII), the leading authority on the issue. He did not misstate any of the principles set out in that case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for finding a claimant entitled to a remedy for unjust enrichment? (Yukon, Canada)
What are the elements of a cause of action in unjust enrichment? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for unjust enrichment in the law of constructive trust? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in England and Wales with respect to the doctrine of "no" reasoning? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for obtaining evidence of when a judge made a decision? (Yukon, Canada)
When will a judge order severance in a personal injury action? (Yukon, Canada)
What are the factors that a trial judge should consider when deciding on the question of admissibility? (Yukon, Canada)
What are the reasons why a trial judge rejected an appellant’s testimony? (Yukon, Canada)
When will a judge refuse to return a child to his wife's home in Tanzania? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for a court to grant interim custody to a father who has been granted interim custody of his children by a judge? (Yukon, Canada)
