How is a postarrest statement to police admissible?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Medina, 11 Cal.4th 694, 47 Cal.Rptr.2d 165, 906 P.2d 2 (Cal. 1995):

Prior to trial, and without objection on Miranda grounds, the court ruled admissible defendant's postarrest statement to police after being read his Miranda rights. (See Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694.) After one of the officers indicated that he wanted to talk about the Riverside County murder, defendant asked, "What do you want me to say?" The officer replied that he only "wanted to talk about the truth." Whereupon defendant stated, "If I could only cry, but I can't cry. I couldn't even cry when my mother died." No further conversation took place.

Other Questions


Can a Defendant challenge a finding that the victim's statements to police officers were admissible as prior inconsistent statements? (California, United States of America)
Are portions of each accomplice's statement to the police admissible under the prior inconsistent statement exception? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting an admission of a statement to a police officer that he would kill the first police officer to step inside his cell if he was not permitted to visit with his wife? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant has adopted a statement as his own as an adoptive admission, is that statement admissible under the hearsay rule? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated recanted statements to the police, hospital personnel and the police? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of extrajudicial admissions to the police admissible? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have the courts permitted the admission of statements from a defendant to police as evidence for impeachment purposes? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have the courts permitted the admission of statements from a defendant to police as evidence for impeachment purposes? (California, United States of America)
What is the state's burden of admissibility of statements obtained through police questioning without Miranda warnings? (California, United States of America)
Is an improper statement in a jury trial admissible to show the effect on the jurors' mental processes of other, improper statements? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.