The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Valenzuela, 17 F.3d 397 (9th Cir. 1994):
The denial of a motion for a mistrial based on improper prosecutorial remarks is reviewed for abuse of discretion. United States v. Monks, 774 F.2d 945, 954-55 (9th Cir.1985); United States v. Charmley, 764 F.2d 675, 677 & n. 1 (9th Cir.1985). The reviewing court determines whether it was more probable than not that the improper remarks materially affected the fairness of the trial. United States v. Polizzi, 801 F.2d 1543, 1558 (9th Cir.1986).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.