How have the courts treated the issue of mental competence in this case?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from United States v. Mikhel, 889 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir. 2018):

The parties dispute whether the district court held a competency hearing in this case. We need not resolve that dispute and assume without deciding that no competency hearing occurred. For this reason, and because defense counsel never moved for a competency hearing,14 we pass to considering whether the district court plainly erred in failing to order a competency hearing sua sponte. See United States v. Dreyer , 705 F.3d 951, 960 (9th Cir. 2013).

Other Questions


How have courts treated mental health issues in mental health cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the "law of the case" doctrine preclude a court from reexamining an issue previously decided by the same court in the same case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the issue of a search warrant issued by a state court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of affirmative defense in cases involving sexual assault cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of immunity from prosecution in civil cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of misbehaviour in the context of prison security issues? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law requiring the trial court to refrain from hearing cases before the appeals court? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is a prothonotary's order for an appeal of an order requiring the Court of Appeal to consider the issues raised in this appeal are "vital to the final issue of the case"? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How have the courts treated evidence of memory loss in a mental health case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of refugee protection in civil cases? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.