How have the courts treated prior conviction evidence in a sexual assault case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The PEOPLE V. ADAMSON, G042000, No. 08WF2620 (Cal. App. 2010):
Moreover, the court's instructions to the jury on the limited use of the prior conviction evidence eliminated any danger "of confusing the issues[] or of misleading the jury." (Evid. Code, 352.) We presume the jury "followed these instructions." (People v. Coffman andMarlow (2004) 34 Cal.4th 1, 107.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the court treated evidence of a prior conviction for abuse of children in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated prior conviction evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated prior conviction evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated evidence of prior convictions of a defendant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated prior convictions in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, how have the courts dealt with claims that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding evidence of the victim's other sexual conduct? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated allegations of sexual assault in sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting prior sexual assault evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissibility of evidence of prior sexual assault in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
