California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The People v. Roman, E048032, No. RIF090046 (Cal. App. 2010):
Here, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that the misconduct was not prejudicial. In each instance, it sustained defense counsel's objection, and it instructed the jury to disregard the excluded evidence. At the end of the trial, the trial court also gave the standard instruction that (1) the attorneys' questions are not evidence; (2) if the court sustained an objection, the jury must ignore the question; and (3) if the court ordered testimony stricken from the record, the jury must disregard it. (CALCRIM No. 104.) We normally presume that the jury followed these instructions. (People v. Bennett, supra, 45 Cal.4th at p. 595.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.