How have the courts interpreted the statutory presumption that a marriage was not entered into to evade the immigration laws?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Sarang v. I.N.S., 19 F.3d 1441 (9th Cir. 1994):
Thus, the respondent had the burden of coming forward with sufficient evidence to rebut the statutory presumption. We conclude that he has failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the marriage to Tina Bustos Romero was not entered into in order to evade the immigration laws. See Baliza v. INS, 709 F.2d 1231, 1233 (9th Cir.1983).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a motion to compel the Court to dismiss a motion alleging that a judge has improperly interpreted the interpretation of a statutory interpretation of an administrative determination? ("New York", United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a bankruptcy court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a common law marriage valid in a state that does not recognize common law marriages? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the interpretation of reasons in cases involving judicial review in the immigration context? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does a federal habeas court have to defer to a state court's construction of state law rather than federal law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the common law and statutory definitions of accomplice liability in a sexual assault case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When will the federal courts interpret a copyright transfer agreement based on state law rather than federal law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted bankruptcy law in the context of bankruptcy law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
