The following excerpt is from Smith v. Barnesandnoble.com, LLC, 120 U.S.P.Q.2d 1316, 839 F.3d 163 (2nd Cir. 2016):
We conclude that the conduct at issue was authorized by the relevant contracts between the parties. See Revson v. Cinque & Cinque, P.C., 221 F.3d 59, 66 (2d Cir. 2000) (Under New York law, the meaning of a contract that is unambiguous is a question of law for the court to decide.).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.