How have the courts interpreted the language of the majority opinion in a motion that reverses the trial court's judgment that proxies cannot be used in the election of directors?

California, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Braude v. Automobile Club of Southern Cal., 144 Cal.Rptr. 169, 78 Cal.App.3d 178 (Cal. App. 1978):

I concur in that part of the judgment and that part of the majority opinion which reverses the trial court's judgment that (a) declares proxies may not be used in the election of directors and (b) awards attorney's fees. However, in other respects I believe that the language of the majority opinion, as well as the trial court, too liberally interprets the decision and holding of Braude v. Havenner, 38 Cal.App.3d 526, 529, 113 Cal.Rptr. 386.

Page 175

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Try it today free of charge!

The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.

Other Questions

Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)

When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)

Is there any case law where the trial court would have exercised its discretion not to award a motion for damages even if the trial judge was aware of the fact that the motion was being brought before the court? (California, United States of America)

Can a judgment of conviction be reversed and a new trial ordered for a trial court's failure to hear a motion? (California, United States of America)

Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)

How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)

Does a motion for a new trial have to be granted because the trial court refused to grant a motion to sever? (California, United States of America)

In what circumstances have courts reversed a judgment entered in a criminal case following a court trial? (California, United States of America)

On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)

How has the Court of Appeal dealt with a motion to reverse a judgment in the Superior Court of Justice? (California, United States of America)

How have the courts interpreted the language of the majority opinion in a motion that reverses the trial court's judgment that proxies cannot be used in the election of directors?

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Other Questions

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.

Company

Product

Resources