How have the courts instructed the jury to consider jury instructions in the context of the facts of a case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Mastrangelo, B252685 (Cal. App. 2015):

Moreover, jury instructions are not considered in isolation; the entire charge to the jury must be considered in determining whether instructions were correct and adequate. (People v. Holt (1997) 15 Cal.4th 619, 677.) The trial court instructed the jury with CALCRIM No. 200,5 which informed the jurors they must decide the facts of the case and that the jury alone must decide what happened. CALCRIM No. 2006 also instructed the jury to consider all of the jury instructions together, and to consider them equally. The trial court further instructed the jury with CALCRIM No. 301,7 which states that the testimony of only one witness can prove any fact and CALCRIM No. 302,8 which

Page 10

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted the instructions in the context of manslaughter instructions in cases where the instruction was limited or limited? (California, United States of America)
In determining the sufficiency of evidence in a civil case, how have courts considered the evidence in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to instruct a jury to disregard an instruction in an assault case where the instruction had no antecedent in the facts? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the jury be instructed to follow the law as instructed, rather than consider any comments by the prosecutor that conflicted with the trial court's instructions? (California, United States of America)
In a medical malpractice case, in the context of sexual assault allegations, is there any case law where a jury was instructed to consider the evidence in the closing argument? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the instruction in the context of a jury instruction in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts considered "laying in wait" instruction in the context of a woman's murder case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the facts in our statement of facts in the context of a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, if the trial court improperly failed to instruct on a lesser included offense, does the court have to re-examine the facts of the case? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.