How have courts treated the issue of prosecutorial misconduct in a criminal case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Yates, G050275 (Cal. App. 2015):
1. While defense counsel did not object to this line of questioning on the basis of prosecutorial misconduct, his persistent objections to it sufficed to preserve the issue of prosecutorial misconduct for purposes of appeal. (People v. Pearson (2013) 56 Cal.4th 393, 434.)
2. All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts dealt with the issue of prosecutorial misconduct in criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the allegation of Prosecutorial misconduct in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of prosecutorial error in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of improper instruction in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated evidence of uncharged crimes and acts of misconduct in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated the issue of substitute counsel in the sanity phase of a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the issue of prosecutorial discovery in criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated the issue of "inappropriate" instruction in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of electronic surveillance in a juvenile court case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated allegations of misconduct by a prosecutor in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
