How have courts treated the issue of jurisdiction over a person in a personal injury case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Mib, Inc. v. Superior Court, 106 Cal.App.3d 228, 164 Cal.Rptr. 828 (Cal. App. 1980):
The single case which we have found which applied this rule to the issue of jurisdiction over the person is Archie v. Piaggo & Co. (1968) 109 N.H. 162, 245 A.2d 76.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the court treated a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated restitution fines and court assessment fees in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the statement of the case in the opening brief of a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have jurisdiction to award costs and attorney fees in a personal injury action where the substantive demand is within the jurisdiction of a municipal court? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
