California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Haskett, 180 Cal.Rptr. 640, 30 Cal.3d 841, 640 P.2d 776 (Cal. 1982):
We next address defendant's claim that he was denied equal protection because the district attorney sought the death penalty in his case, while choosing not to pursue[640 P.2d 788] it in other, assertedly similar cases. Defendant relies by analogy on Furman v. Georgia (1972) 408 U.S. [30 Cal.3d 860] 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726,
Page 652
Defendant offers no proof to support his contention that exclusion of two jurors at the guilt phase because of their opposition to capital punishment denied him the right to an impartial jury. We have recently held that absent empirical evidence in support of this contention, we will not declare the existing procedure unconstitutional. (Hovey v. Superior Court (1980) 28 Cal.3d 1, 68-69, 168 Cal.Rptr. 128, 616 P.2d 1301.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.