How have courts treated mitigating evidence in a criminal case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Mickey, 286 Cal.Rptr. 801, 54 Cal.3d 612, 818 P.2d 84 (Cal. 1991):

"Although the trial court did not expressly mention the mitigating evidence referred to by defendant, there is no indication in the record that the court ignored or overlooked such evidence." (People v. Ruiz (1988) 44 Cal.3d 589, 625, 244 Cal.Rptr. 200, 749 P.2d 854, italics in original.)

Other Questions


In a civil case, how has the court treated the use of DNA evidence in criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated evidence of good character and even temper in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the evidence of uncharged crimes against a defendant in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal treat a challenge to the sufficiency of evidence to support a judgment in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated evidence in the context of evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated evidence of a common design or plan in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of a prosecutor's argument to a jury in a criminal case that the jury should consider mitigation in all mitigation evidence? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated mitigating evidence in a mental health case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated an improper admission of hearsay evidence in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated evidence of uncharged crimes and acts of misconduct in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.