California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Littman, A143133 (Cal. App. 2016):
One of the reasons for the extensive excerpts quoted above was to establish the absence of the words "stalking," "harassment," "legitimate purpose," "course of conduct," or "section 646.9," which calls into question whether "[t]he substance, purpose, and relevance of the excluded evidence was made known to the court," thus preserving the issue for review. (Evid. Code, 354, subd. (a); People v. Ervine (2009) 47 Cal.4th 745, 783.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.