How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Penal Code?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Tipton, C083065 (Cal. App. 2019):
Footnotes:
1. Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.
2. People v. Fares (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 954; People v. Clavel (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 516.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Arizona Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Arizona Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Penal Code in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
