How have courts interpreted section 186.22.22 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant and an aider and abettor of the crime are accused of the same crime?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Garcia, H040067 (Cal. App. 2015):
predicate offense, because the combined activity of a defendant and an aider and abettor to the crime results in only a single predicate offense for purposes of section 186.22. (People v. Zermeno (1999) 21 Cal.4th 927, 928-929, 931.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is convicted of a sex offence under both sections of the S. 654(1) and (2) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 31 of the California Criminal Code permit an aider and abettor to be convicted of a lesser crime or lesser degree of crime than the ultimate crime committed by the perpetrator? (California, United States of America)
Can a self-represented defendant be found guilty of a criminal act against a criminal defendant under section 352 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 26 exempt a person from criminal liability under section 26 of the California Criminal Code from a general intent crime if they committed the crime while unconscious? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant is accused of a sexual offence in a criminal action in which he is also accused of another sexual offence, is evidence of his disposition to commit such crimes considered to be inadmissible under California Evidence Code section 1108? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1018 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant makes a statement in open court that authorizes or adopts a motion to withdraw his plea? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who commits the crime of grand theft auto in violation of section 487, subdivision (d) of section 666.5 of the California Criminal Code, be convicted of the crime? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
