How have courts interpreted findings of fact and conclusions of law in the context of the AEDPA restrictions?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Rudenko v. Costello, 286 F.3d 51 (2nd Cir. 2002):
Tucker v. Howard, 177 F.2d at 496-97 (emphasis added). The importance of findings of fact and conclusions of law takes on even greater importance today, given that the applicability of several AEDPA restrictions may depend on the ground of the district court's decision.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a bankruptcy court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a diversity action brought by the California Board of Directors, how have the courts interpreted the findings of the federal district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted agency interpretation in the context of national security legislation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the Court interpreted the doctrine of federal jurisdiction in the context of the federal courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted federal legislation in the context of constitutional interpretation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted interpretative regulations in the context of the communications industry? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the interpretation of reasons in cases involving judicial review in the immigration context? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
