How have courts interpreted discovery provisions in arbitration agreements?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Brown v. Auto. Club of S. Cal., B241995 (Cal. App. 2013):
Similarly, in Dotson v. Amgen, Inc. (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 975, an appendix to the arbitration agreement contained a discovery provision, stating: "'Each party shall have the right to take the deposition of one individual and any expert witness designated
Page 11
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted the arbitration provisions in determining whether an arbitration provision applies to a certain controversy? (California, United States of America)
When an arbitration agreement requires the parties to share the costs of arbitration, does the court have jurisdiction to order that party to waive its right to arbitrate the other party's claim? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for petitioning a superior court for an order compelling the parties to arbitrate their dispute pursuant to an arbitration agreement? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the attorney fees provision in an agreement? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a motor vehicle insurance contract in the context of an arbitration? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted a waiver agreement where the waiver agreement was ambiguous or ambiguous? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted collective bargaining agreements in employment arbitration? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted anti-assignment provisions in structured settlement agreements? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted plea agreements where a defendant's plea agreement states that he should receive a jail sentence based on his criminal conviction rather than that set forth in the criminal plea form? (California, United States of America)
