How have courts determined that statements made by appellant at the hospital and the sheriff's station were not the result of custodial interrogation?

techniques to pressure him. On the contrary, every effort was made to ensure that appellant was comfortable and that his needs were accommodated. The court thus correctly found, under the totality of the circumstances, that appellant's statements at the hospital and the sheriff's station were not the result of a custodial interrogation. (People v. Leonard, supra, 40 Cal.4th at p. 1400.) The cases appellant cites in support of his claim are plainly inapposite.³