The following excerpt is from Lemus v. Cnty. of Merced, No. 1:15-cv-00359-MCE-EPG (E.D. Cal. 2016):
107 (9th Cir. 1988) (two incidents insufficient), with Menotti v. City of Seattle, 409 F.3d 1113, 1147 (9th Cir. 2005) (triable issue of fact existed as to whether Seattle had an unconstitutional policy or custom of suppressing certain political speech given the fact that several individuals testified their entry to a demonstration was permitted only after they removed offending buttons and stickers).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.