The following excerpt is from United States v. Novick, 450 F.2d 1111 (9th Cir. 1971):
This issue was decided adversely to appellant's contention in United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601, 91 S.Ct. 1112, 28 L.Ed.2d 356 (1971) and United States v. Jones, 446 F.2d 12 (9th Cir. 1971).
Appellant's argument that he lacked notice of the registration requirements of the statute is completely without merit.
While United States v. Freed, supra, did not directly pass on appellant's argument that the registration requirements of the legislation violated his Fifth Amendment rights, the issue has recently been decided against his contention in Warren v. United States, 447 F.2d 259 (9th Cir., Aug. 13, 1971).
Affirmed.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.