California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rowe-Manns, C072576 (Cal. App. 2014):
On appeal, the defendant contended the trial court erred in not substituting the alternate juror after it was learned one juror " 'committed misconduct' " by reading the article. (People v. McIntyre, supra, 115 Cal.App.3d at p. 905.) The appellate court found defendant forfeited the argument because after the juror was examined, defendant made no motion for a mistrial nor did he request substitution of the alternate juror. (Id. at p. 906.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.