How have courts dealt with claims of fraud in connection with the transfer of property and annulment of the marriage?

The body of the argument following this caption, however, appears to deal with cases such as Schaub v. Schaub (1945) 71 Cal.App.2d 467, 162 P.2d 966. Wife argues that in all cases which involved a claim of fraud in connection with annulment of the marriage and concurrently a claim of fraud in connection with the transfer of property, either fraud was found to exist in both claims or found not to exist in both claims. This is of no significance here in view of our conclusion that the judgment for moneys is supported and mandated by the findings of fact, irrespective of fraud.