California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Watts, C081494 (Cal. App. 2016):
A jury convicted defendant of attempted murder for repeatedly stabbing the victim, mistakenly believing the victim had repossessed his car. Defendant appealed, and
Page 2
this court affirmed the judgment. (People v. Watts (Nov. 20, 2014, C073627) [nonpub. opn.].)
A year later, defendant filed with the superior court, a "Petition For [Motion] To Vacate Judgment Under Penal Code, [] 995-999[, subd.](a); For Violation [Evid[.] Code. []788]; Penal Code,[]1054.1[,] subd.[ ](d)." He averred the prosecution had failed to provide full discovery in violation of Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83 [10 L.Ed.2d 215], as to the victim, who testified for the prosecution. He attached as an exhibit a declaration of a private investigator who searched various databases for the witness's criminal history and found additional "possible" criminal information.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.