How have courts dealt with a defendant's claims of error, error, and prejudicial?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Brambila, G046681 (Cal. App. 2013):
Defendant lastly asserts the alleged errors cumulatively compromised his due process rights and were prejudicial. "'We have either rejected on the merits defendant's claims of error or have found any assumed errors to be nonprejudicial. We reach the same conclusion with respect to the cumulative effect of any assumed errors.'" (People v. Cole (2004) 33 Cal.4th 1158, 1235-1236.)
The judgment is affirmed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
Is a claim for damages brought by defendant in a personal injury action brought by plaintiff against defendant in the Superior Court of Appeal against Defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with a claim of error by a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a defendant's claim that the cumulative effect of evidentiary errors denied him due process? (California, United States of America)
How have we dealt with the Attorney General's contention that a defendant forfeited any claim of error by failing to object or request modification to an instruction in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant bring a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeal claiming that he failed to raise his constitutional claims in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court of Appeal in Ontario dealt with appellant's claim that he was prejudiced by the error-strewn trial court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with error at trial where a prosecutor made an error in making an improper remark to a defendant? (California, United States of America)
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
