How have appellate courts treated the issue of judicial review in the context of the same sex marriage cases?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Barron v. Nat'l Mentor Healthcare, LLC, D063482 (Cal. App. 2014):
Niko v. Foreman (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 344, 368 ["One cannot simply say the court erred, and leave it up to the appellate court to figure out why"]; In re Marriage of Schroeder (1987) 192 Cal.App.3d 1154, 1164 ["court is not inclined to act as counsel for . . . any appellant and furnish a legal argument as to how the trial court's rulings in this regard constituted an abuse of discretion."].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
After reviewing the record of a motion brought by appellant in the Superior Court of Appeal against the appellant, what is the appellant's request for an independent review of the record? (California, United States of America)
Does the law of the case doctrine preclude a party from seeking review of the same issue already decided by an appellate court in that case? (California, United States of America)
What is the case law on recidivism, cruel and unusual punishment, and how has the Court treated the appellant in the context of his appeal against his enhanced sentence? (California, United States of America)
Is an appeal moot when, through no fault of the appellant, an event occurs which makes it impossible for the reviewing court to provide any effective relief to the appellant even when ruling in the appellant's favor? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court treated prior sexual assault cases in the context of domestic violence cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of electronic surveillance in a juvenile court case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the issue of consent in the context of a refund fraud case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated cases involving young defendants with severe intellectual deficiency in the context of mental health issues? (California, United States of America)
How have the Courts treated the issue of "forfeasibility" in the context of the appellant's appeal against his conviction for receiving stolen property? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
