How has the US Supreme Court interpreted the equal protection clause in voting rights?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Westbrook v. Mihaly, 2 Cal.3d 765, 471 P.2d 487, 87 Cal.Rptr. 839 (Cal. 1970):

The court has entered the 'political thicket' (Colegrove v. Green (1946) 328 U.S. 549, 556, 66 S.Ct. 1198, 90 L.Ed. 1432) to enforce the equal protection clause in three principal contexts. The first such category is composed of cases involving state laws that exclude various groups from voting in all or in certain types of elections. The court has eliminated many of these barriers to the electoral process; it has invalidated residency requirements excluding servicemen, 20 qualifying examinations excluding racial minorities, 21 poll taxes excluding the poor and indigent, 22 and property qualifications excluding the landless. 23 The effect of these, and of related decisions, 24 has been to expand sharply the number of persons entitled to participate actively in the election process. This court, for example, complying with principles established by the above line of cases, has limited the application of two voter qualification provisions contained in our state Constitution. 25

Page 849

Other Questions


How have courts treated a defendant's claim for equal protection under the equal protection clause? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for denying equal protection under the equal protection clause? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for claiming equal protection under the equal protection clause against someone who commits fraud "simply to obtain foodstuffs and other necessities"? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for equal protection under the equal protection clause? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an equal protection claim under the equal protection clause based on sentencing disparities? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for making an equal protection claim under the equal protection clause? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the equal protection clause in the context of legislative reapportionment litigation? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for equal protection under the equal protection clause? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff argue that he was denied equal protection under section 1108 of the California Code of Civil Procedure because he did not object on the basis of his right to equal protection? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.