How has the extended statute of limitations been interpreted?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Lamb, 76 Cal.App.4th 664, 90 Cal.Rptr.2d 565 (Cal. App. 1999):
4. The general history and framework of the extended statute of limitations provision is discussed in People v. Frazer (1999) 21 Cal.4th 737, which rejected claims that it violated constitutional ex post facto principles or substantive due process. Frazer did not, however, address the statutory interpretation question presented here.
4. The general history and framework of the extended statute of limitations provision is discussed in People v. Frazer (1999) 21 Cal.4th 737, which rejected claims that it violated constitutional ex post facto principles or substantive due process. Frazer did not, however, address the statutory interpretation question presented here.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
