California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Schoshinski v. City of L. A., 215 Cal.Rptr.3d 211, 9 Cal.App.5th 780 (Cal. App. 2017):
recognized the duty a named plaintiff owes to the class, and the "flexible character" of mootness in such actions. (Geraghty, supra, 445 U.S. at pp. 400-401, 100 S.Ct. 1202 ; La Sala v. American Sav. & Loan Assn. (1971) 5 Cal.3d 864, 871, 97 Cal.Rptr. 849, 489 P.2d 1113 (La Sala ).) Thus, even when the named plaintiff's claims are moot, courts have under some circumstances applied exceptions to the mootness doctrine to allow the plaintiff to continue prosecuting the suit. Plaintiffs invoke one such exceptionthe "pick
[215 Cal.Rptr.3d 220]
off" exceptionwhich we discuss at length below.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.