How has the court interpreted the law in the context of a search and seizure of a firearm under the Mental Health Act?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Stoney, 2d Crim. No. B281098 (Cal. App. 2017):
firearm against the officers or other occupants. "Speed here was essential, and only a thorough search of the house for persons and weapons could have insured that [defendant] was the only man present and that the police had control of all weapons which could be used against them . . . ." (Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden (1967) 387 U.S. 294, 299.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does Section 1054.3(b) of the Mental Health Act restrict the prosecution's access to materials derived from mental health examinations conducted under section 1054 of the Act, which were obtained from a mental health clinic? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated mental health issues in the context of mental health care cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the "plain view" doctrine in the context of search and seizure cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the exclusionary rule in the context of search and seizure cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated mental health issues in a mental health case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted "patient privilege" in the context of a mental health case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted consent to search searches in the context of a traffic stop? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the search rules in the context of a search warrant application? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the term "mental illness" in section 232 of the Mental Health Act? (California, United States of America)
