How has the court found that petitioner acted with reckless indifference to human life?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Antonelli, 2d Crim. No. B299749 (Cal. App. 2020):
found that petitioner was a major participant and acted with a reckless indifference to human life. This factual finding is subject to review by the well-settled substantial evidence rule. (See, e.g., People v. Morales (2020) 10 Cal.5th 76, 88.) Substantial evidence supports the trial court's ruling.
The judgment is affirmed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a jury found appellant was a major participant in the robbery who acted with reckless indifference to human life and that the murder occurred during the robbery? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury find that a defendant acted with reckless indifference to human life during an attempted robbery? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant need to be present at all to be found to demonstrate reckless indifference to human life? (California, United States of America)
Does the question of whether a defendant was a major participant in the underlying felony and acted with reckless indifference to human life apply only to defendants convicted of felony murder? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reckless indifference to human life for a felony-murder aider and abettor? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes a "reckless indifference to human life" in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Does a finding that defendant intended to kill or acted with reckless indifference to life need to sustain a special circumstance? (California, United States of America)
Does the meaning of "reckless indifference to human life" need to be clarified? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion where the Court of Appeal found that a lower court found that there was insufficient evidence to support the Plaintiff's claim? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
