How has the comparative fault doctrine been interpreted in a motor vehicle accident case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Kindt v. Kauffman, 129 Cal.Rptr. 603, 57 Cal.App.3d 845 (Cal. App. 1976):
The comparative fault doctrine of Li v. Yellow Cab effectively rearranges the pro and can factors affecting the formulation of a duty of care. The prospect of split liability or shared loss plays a profound and powerful role in the duty analysis.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for a motor vehicle accident under the California Vehicle Accident Act or the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, how have the courts interpreted the standard factor (a)-(b) and (b) instruction in determining the severity of the accident? (California, United States of America)
Does section 3110 of the Ontario Motor Vehicle Code of Civil Procedure (Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Benefits Act) apply to a mechanic's lien claimant? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an action under the California Motor Vehicle Accident Prevention Act for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
Does the phrase "as a result of" in a motor vehicle accident apply to a section of the Motor Vehicle Accident Act? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, what is the effect of following the initial movement of the vehicle after a stop? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of different jurisdictions' comparative negligence statutes on the doctrine of contributory negligence in a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant in a motor vehicle accident case to argue that the accident was not a crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant case law on the sufficiency of evidence in a motor vehicle accident case? (California, United States of America)
Is an employer's claim for reimbursement under section 3852 of the California Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Compensation Act limited to recovery for damages proximately caused by the accident? (California, United States of America)
