How has section 821.6 of the California Human Rights Code been interpreted by the Court of Appeal?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Angeles v. City of San Diego, Civil No. 14cv1942 L (WVG) (S.D. Cal. 2015):
and was not for the benefit or purposes of the individual defendants. "Whether the investigatory duties were carried out negligently, maliciously, or without probable cause, they were within the scope of employment for purposes of section 821.6." Id. at 1063 (citing Baughman v. State, 38 Cal. App.4th 182, 192 (1995).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does section 33 of the Health and Social Care Ontario Health and Welfare Act, section 933(a) of the Human Rights and Human Rights Act, apply to an employer's liability under the Health & Social Care Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has section 2191.4 of the California Tax Code been interpreted by the Court of Appeal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 56(2) of the Income Tax Code in the context of Section 56(1) and Section 5(2)? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the scope of a section 2(2) of the Human Rights Act, section 3(4) and section 4(5) of The Queen’s Speech to the House of Representatives on the issue of same sex discrimination? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the timing of a motion for attorney's fees and costs in the wake of the Court of Appeal's decision of appeal against the Supreme Court of Justice's decision to dismiss the appeal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the "control" test applied by the California Court of Appeal to determine whether the California Department of Justice has a role in determining whether or not the California Board of Representatives has any role in the decision? ("New York", United States of America)
How have courts interpreted s. 2(e) of the Canadian Bill of Rights, s.2(e), s.3(e") of the Charter of Human Rights? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the opposition clause of section 704(a) of the Ontario Human Rights Code? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a waiver of the right to appeal enforceable by the Court of Appeal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
