How does the crime of burglary require entry into a specified structure with the intent to commit theft or any felony?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Webster, F069405 (Cal. App. 2016):

The crime of burglary requires "an entry into a specified structure with the intent to commit theft or any felony. [Citations.]" (People v. Tafoya (2007) 42 Cal.4th 147, 170-171.) Possession of stolen property by itself is insufficient to permit an inference that a defendant is guilty of any offense without some corroborating evidence. (People v. Moore (2011) 51 Cal.4th 1104, 1130.)

"CALJIC No. 2.15 is based on the long-standing rule allowing a jury to infer guilt of a theft-related crime from the fact that a defendant is found in possession of recently stolen property when such evidence is accompanied by slight corroboration of other inculpatory circumstances tending to show guilt. [Citation.]" (People v. Rogers (2013) 57 Cal.4th 296, 335.) A defendant's false statements regarding stolen property may be used to corroborate an inference of guilt, and a conviction for burglary can be supported from possession of recently stolen property along with a false explanation. (People v. McFarland (1962) 58 Cal.2d 748, 754.)

Other Questions


Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code preclude punishment for both burglary and theft where the crime was committed based on intent to commit the crime? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding that a crime committed by appellant was committed with the specific intent to commit a crime against a specific gang member? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether there were two crimes committed at the same time, one committed with the same intent and objectives, and the other committed with different intentions and objectives? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant guilty of burglary if he enters with the intent to commit one crime but ultimately commits another? (California, United States of America)
Does assault with intent to commit a crime require the wrongdoer's present ability to commit the assault? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to be punished separately for both the burglary and the crime committed inside the structure, such as theft or robbery? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to prove a burglary can be proven where the required intent was formed after the crime was committed? (California, United States of America)
Is a conviction under section 220 of the California Criminal Code for assault with intent to commit a felony during the commission of a first degree burglary a lesser included crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.