California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Marquez, 242 Cal.Rptr.3d 530, 31 Cal.App.5th 402 (Cal. App. 2019):
[Fourth Amendment] guaranty in the only effectively available wayby removing the incentive to disregard it." ( Elkins v. United States (1960) 364 U.S. 206, 217, 80 S.Ct. 1437, 4 L.Ed.2d 1669.)
However, the fact that a Fourth Amendment violation has occurred does not automatically require the application of the exclusionary rule. (See Herring v. United States (2009) 555 U.S. 135, 140, 129 S.Ct. 695, 172 L.Ed.2d 496.) "Indeed, exclusion has always been our last resort, not our first impulse. " ( Ibid . ) "We have repeatedly rejected the argument that exclusion is a necessary consequence of a Fourth Amendment violation." ( Id . at p. 141, 129 S.Ct. 695.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.