What is the test for an appeal against the findings and conclusions of a jury in a sexual assault case?

These are factual issues, and this Court must approach the trial judge’s findings and inferences of fact with a high degree of deference, and may not interfere merely because we take a different view of the evidence. Instead, the appellant must establish that the trial judge made a palpable and overriding error in her factual conclusions, or in the inferences she drew from those conclusions: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235 at paras. 21, 23-25.