Fortunately, this somewhat unproductive discussion of procedure and seeming inconsistent standards on motions to strike out for want of jurisdiction has been laid to rest in Hodgson v. The Queen. In my reasons of 10 September 1999, in action T-2553-91, I set out at paragraph 28 that I would only find want of jurisdiction where a matter was plain, obvious and beyond doubt, which was not there the case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.