As set out in Hanson v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2006 BCSC 210, at para. 17: The case authorities are clear that the Adjudicator is not required to give reasons for preferring or rejecting evidence (Wanless v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) 2000 BCSC 1152). It is sufficient if the reasoning process is apparent from the decision and there is some evidentiary basis for all essential findings (Hegelsen v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) 2002 BCSC 1391).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.