Is there any prejudice to the administration of justice in family law proceedings if the evidence of a telephone conversation is routinely admitted?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Ackerman v Ackerman, 2013 SKQB 247 (CanLII):
Finally, and very importantly, is the prejudice to the administration of justice in family law proceedings if this nature of evidence was routinely admitted. Although the issue in Hameed v. Hameed, supra, was recorded telephone calls, the sentiments expressed therein at para. 11 are equally applicable here:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for admitting evidence of conversations between the parties prior to and at the time of a contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the limits of what can be included in an affidavit in a family law proceeding? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the limited character of the administration granted to an administrator ad litem? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the range of penalty for a Member of the House of Representatives who forged affidavits in support of motions to extend the time period for making certain applications in a family law proceeding? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there a conversion in the terms of the will of a testator to a personal estate where the proceeds of the real estate are transferred to the residuary legatees? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a deferred distribution of the proceeds of a property be foreclosed to achieve justice? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted “without prejudice” without prejudice communications? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the legal test for admitting fresh evidence in a personal injury case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a Traffic Safety Court Justice of the Peace (JPS) have any authority or authority to reject or reject the evidence presented by the defence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can evidence of a chemical analysis of a sample taken after the 2-hour period be used in evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
