What is the current state of the law in the context of a patent review?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Peterson v. Kentville (Town), 2008 NSSC 254 (CanLII):
Grove v. Chester involved a review at the outmoded “patent unreasonableness” standard. Dunsmuir requires a review for reasonableness or correctness. So, the analysis needs to be refined: the decision to issue a development permit is reviewable for its reasonableness, not correctness.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the current state of the law in the context of child protection proceedings? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on cogency in the context of litigation? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in the context of workplace disputes? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in the context of a custody dispute? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in the context of child protection cases? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duty? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in the US when it comes to limiting the scope of a plaintiff’s discovery of evidence in a separate proceeding? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on the immunity of a policy decision? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in Canada on interim parenting arrangements? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for reasonableness in the context of a judicial review? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
