The trial judge, in his analysis, acknowledged the authority of Gordon v. Goertz, 1996 CanLII 191 (SCC), [1996] 2 S.C.R. 27 and quoted extensively from the summary at para. 49 of Madam Justice McLachlin's decision in that case. Absent, however, was recognition that Gordon v. Goertz, supra, placed the obligation of establishing sufficient grounds for variation of an existing provision for custody, based on the changed circumstances of a proposed move, on the party challenging the move.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.