The leading case on this issue is Gordon v. Goertz 1996 CanLII 191 (SCC), [1996] 2 S.C.R. 27, 19 R.F.L. (4th) 177. Gordon v. Goertz makes it clear that the focus of the court is the child’s best interests and not the parents’. On a variation application, as we have here, both parents bear an evidentiary burden in establishing the best interests of the children. In Gordon v. Goertz the notion of a presumption in favour of the custodial parent was rejected although the views of the custodial parent were entitled to “great respect”, “great weight” and “serious consideration”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.