How has the Court of Appeal considered the issue of changed social conditions in the context of social security legislation?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Schartner v. Schartner, 1970 CanLII 590 (SK QB):
The matter of costs remains for consideration. The court of appeal took cognizance of changed social conditions in Gooday v. Gooday [1968] 3 WLR 750, 112 Sol J 785, [1968] 3 All ER 611.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review for an appeal against a finding that a decision made by the Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against the decision not to grant an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court review a decision by a majority of the Court of Appeal not adjourning on a motion of appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of section 4(1) of the Statement of Claimant's Affidavit to the Court of Appeal allowing the Court to consider any evidence which is not confined to facts which the deponent is able to prove? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
If an appeal from a justice of the peace has been appealed to the wrong court, can the appeal be dismissed? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge at the Court of Appeal accept responsibility for differing as to the credibility of the witnesses at the Appeal Court? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for allowing evidence to be adduce at the Court of Appeal in the context of an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of housekeeping allowance in the context of a separation claim? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for dismissing an appeal under s. 613(1) (b)(iii) of the Criminal Code of Canada for the error of a judge at the Court of Appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the Respondent Corporation been challenged in the Court of Appeal for failing to provide adequate notice of a dangerous condition? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any jurisdiction to interfere in a finding of fact from the lower courts? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
