How have the courts treated the tort of breach of fiduciary duty in the context of a claim in a personal injury case?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Kiska v. Moore, 2017 ONSC 6872 (CanLII):
The majority in Frame v. Smith took a view different from Wilson J. on the tort of breach of fiduciary duty but agreed that she had “adequately disposed of the possibility of other existing torts applying to the circumstances of this case.” [Emphasis added]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts in Canada dealt with the issue of personal injury cases involving personal injury claims? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of negligence in the context of personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law in the context of personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the principle of approbation and reprobation in the context of a claim for damages in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for disbursements of personal injury compensation in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the fiduciary duties owed to a person in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on personal injury representation in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the consequences of a personal injury claim being awarded personally against a lawyer? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the fiduciary duty of a trustee in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts treated privacy concerns for a plaintiff in her personal computer case? (Ontario, Canada)
